Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasRedbridgeBridge ward1651/18
Planning application · Redbridge

1651/18.

96, Snakes Lane East, Woodford Green, IG8 7HX

Full / Other Planning at 96, Snakes Lane East, Woodford Green, IG8 7HX, received 24 Apr 2018 — refused on 24 Dec 2018 (delegated, X Robert Miller).

RedbridgeBridgeIG8 7HX1651/18
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRedbridge profile →
Refused
Outcome
24 Dec 2018
35 wks
Decision time
27 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Redbridge planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Conversion of a building to form 2 no. flats incorporating rear dormer and a single storey infill extension. (Summary)

Reference
1651/18
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
IG8 7HX
Ward
Council
Received
24 Apr 2018
Validated
4 May 2018
Target date
28 Jun 2018
Decision date
24 Dec 2018
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Despatched
Reference
1651/18
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
IG8 7HX
Ward
Council
Received
24 Apr 2018
Validated
4 May 2018
Target date
28 Jun 2018
Decision date
24 Dec 2018
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Despatched
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Redbridge portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 24 Dec 2018, delegated decision by X Robert Miller — 35 weeks from submission (27 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
24 Apr 2018
Application received
4 May 2018
Application validated
28 Jun 2018
Statutory target date
24 Dec 2018
Delegated decision: Refused · X Robert Miller
24 Apr 2018
Application received
4 May 2018
Application validated
28 Jun 2018
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
24 Dec 2018
Delegated decision: Refused · X Robert Miller

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.