Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasRedbridgeMonkhams. ward1790/99
Planning application · Redbridge

1790/99.

Trinity Catholic School, Upper School Site, Mornington Road, Woodford Green.

Full / Other Planning at Trinity Catholic School, Upper School Site, Mornington Road, Woodford Green., received 21 Sep 1999 — approved on 28 Jan 2000 by committee.

RedbridgeMonkhams.IG8 0TP1790/99
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRedbridge profile →
Approved
Outcome
28 Jan 2000
18 wks
Decision time
10 wks over the 8-week target
4
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Redbridge planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Continuation of use of demountable classrooms. RENEWAL OF PERMISSION

Reference
1790/99
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
IG8 0TP
Council
Received
21 Sep 1999
Validated
23 Sep 1999
Target date
18 Nov 1999
Decision date
28 Jan 2000
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decision Made
Reference
1790/99
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
IG8 0TP
Council
Received
21 Sep 1999
Validated
23 Sep 1999
Target date
18 Nov 1999
Decision date
28 Jan 2000
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decision Made
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Redbridge portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 28 Jan 2000, determined by the planning committee — 18 weeks from submission (10 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
21 Sep 1999
Application received
23 Sep 1999
Application validated
18 Nov 1999
Statutory target date
28 Jan 2000
Committee decision: Approved
21 Sep 1999
Application received
23 Sep 1999
Application validated
18 Nov 1999
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
28 Jan 2000
Committee decision: Approved

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Determined at committee
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Show all 4 rows
Determined at committee
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.