Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasRedbridgeBridge. wardIG8 8JQ26, Canfield Road, Woodford Bridge1939/98
Planning application · Redbridge

1939/98.

26, Canfield Road, Woodford Bridge

Full / Other Planning at 26, Canfield Road, Woodford Bridge, received 30 Oct 1998 — approved on 29 Jan 1999 by committee.

RedbridgeBridge.IG8 8JQ1939/98
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRedbridge profile →
Approved
Outcome
29 Jan 1999
13 wks
Decision time
5 wks over the 8-week target
7
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Redbridge planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Two storey side extension, single storey rear extension.

Reference
1939/98
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
30 Oct 1998
Validated
4 Nov 1998
Target date
30 Dec 1998
Decision date
29 Jan 1999
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decision Made
Reference
1939/98
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 17 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
30 Oct 1998
Validated
4 Nov 1998
Target date
30 Dec 1998
Decision date
29 Jan 1999
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decision Made
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Redbridge portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 29 Jan 1999, determined by the planning committee — 13 weeks from submission (5 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
30 Oct 1998
Application received
4 Nov 1998
Application validated
30 Dec 1998
Statutory target date
29 Jan 1999
Committee decision: Approved
30 Oct 1998
Application received
4 Nov 1998
Application validated
30 Dec 1998
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
29 Jan 1999
Committee decision: Approved

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Determined at committee
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Show all 4 rows
Determined at committee
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.