Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Redbridge›…Hainault. ward›2214/01
Planning application · Redbridge

2214/01.

SAFT Ltd., 97-101, Peregrine Road, Hainault.

Full / Other Planning at SAFT Ltd., 97-101, Peregrine Road, Hainault., received 12 Oct 2001 — approved on 15 Mar 2002 by committee.

Redbridge›Hainault.›2214/01
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRedbridge profile →
Approved
Outcome
15 Mar 2002
22 wks
Decision time
14 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Redbridge planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Installation of 6 BT Cellnet antennae with radio equipment housing for use as a roof top telecommunications base station.

Reference
2214/01
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
12 Oct 2001
Target date
7 Dec 2001
Decision date
15 Mar 2002
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decision Despatched
Council register
Reference
2214/01
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
12 Oct 2001
Target date
7 Dec 2001
Decision date
15 Mar 2002
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decision Despatched
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Redbridge portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 15 Mar 2002, determined by the planning committee — 22 weeks from submission (14 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
12 Oct 2001
Application received
7 Dec 2001
Statutory target date
15 Mar 2002
Committee decision: Approved
12 Oct 2001
Application received
7 Dec 2001
Statutory target date
15 Mar 2002
Committee decision: Approved

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Determined at committee
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Show all 4 rows
Determined at committee
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.