Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasRedbridgeBridge. ward622, Chigwell Road, Woodford Bridge2353/02/01
Planning application · Redbridge

2353/02/01.

622, Chigwell Road, Woodford Bridge

Discharge of Conditions at 622, Chigwell Road, Woodford Bridge, received 6 Mar 2009 — approved on 9 Apr 2009 (delegated, X Kim Shaw (inactive)).

RedbridgeBridge.2353/02/01
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationRedbridge profile →
Approved
Outcome
9 Apr 2009
5 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
2
Conditions
attached to the decision
5
Documents
5 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Redbridge planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Refuse Store (Condition 8) Demolition of existing buildings. Erection of 15 fla

Reference
2353/02/01
Type
Discharge of Condition(s)
Council
Received
6 Mar 2009
Target date
30 Apr 2009
Decision date
9 Apr 2009
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decided
Reference
2353/02/01
Type
Discharge of Condition(s)
Show all 15 rows
Council
Received
6 Mar 2009
Target date
30 Apr 2009
Decision date
9 Apr 2009
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
REAR ELEVATION & SECTION
11 Apr 2009
SITE LAYOUT
11 Apr 2009
ELEVATIONS
11 Apr 2009
DISCHARGE OF CONDITION
11 Apr 2009
Decision notice
11 Apr 2009
REAR ELEVATION & SECTION
11 Apr 2009
SITE LAYOUT
11 Apr 2009
ELEVATIONS
11 Apr 2009
Show all 5 rows
DISCHARGE OF CONDITION
11 Apr 2009
Decision notice
11 Apr 2009

Documents open on the Redbridge portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 9 Apr 2009, delegated decision by X Kim Shaw (inactive) — 5 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
6 Mar 2009
Application received
30 Apr 2009
Statutory target date
9 Apr 2009
Delegated decision: Approved · X Kim Shaw (inactive)
6 Mar 2009
Application received
30 Apr 2009
Statutory target date
9 Apr 2009
Delegated decision: Approved · X Kim Shaw (inactive)

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.