Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Redbridge›…Bridge. ward622, Chigwell Road, Woodford Bridge›2353/02J
Planning application · Redbridge

2353/02J.

622, Chigwell Road, Woodford Bridge

Full / Other Planning at 622, Chigwell Road, Woodford Bridge, received 27 Jul 2005 — approved on 31 Aug 2005 (delegated, X Tom Forkan (inactive)B).

Redbridge›Bridge.›2353/02J
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationRedbridge profile →
Approved
Outcome
31 Aug 2005
5 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
2
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Redbridge planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Refuse storage (Condition 8)

Reference
2353/02J
Type
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
27 Jul 2005
Target date
20 Sep 2005
Decision date
31 Aug 2005
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decided
Premises record
Council register
Reference
2353/02J
Type
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
27 Jul 2005
Target date
20 Sep 2005
Decision date
31 Aug 2005
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decided
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Redbridge portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 31 Aug 2005, delegated decision by X Tom Forkan (inactive)B — 5 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
27 Jul 2005
Application received
20 Sep 2005
Statutory target date
31 Aug 2005
Delegated decision: Approved · X Tom Forkan (inactive)B
27 Jul 2005
Application received
20 Sep 2005
Statutory target date
31 Aug 2005
Delegated decision: Approved · X Tom Forkan (inactive)B

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.