Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Redbridge›…Chadwell. wardFormer Chadwell Heath Hospital, Grove Road, Chadwell Heath.›2372/03W
Planning application · Redbridge

2372/03W.

Former Chadwell Heath Hospital, Grove Road, Chadwell Heath.

Full / Other Planning at Former Chadwell Heath Hospital, Grove Road, Chadwell Heath., received 27 May 2005 — refused on 20 Jul 2005 (delegated, X Melek Ergen).

Redbridge›Chadwell.›2372/03W
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRedbridge profile →
Refused
Outcome
20 Jul 2005
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
3
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Redbridge planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Soft Landscaping:(Condition 5) DETAILS FOLLOWING RESERVED MATTERS

Reference
2372/03W
Type
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
27 May 2005
Target date
21 Jul 2005
Decision date
20 Jul 2005
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Despatched
Premises record
Council register
Reference
2372/03W
Type
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
27 May 2005
Target date
21 Jul 2005
Decision date
20 Jul 2005
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Despatched
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Redbridge portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 20 Jul 2005, delegated decision by X Melek Ergen — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
27 May 2005
Application received
21 Jul 2005
Statutory target date
20 Jul 2005
Delegated decision: Refused · X Melek Ergen
27 May 2005
Application received
21 Jul 2005
Statutory target date
20 Jul 2005
Delegated decision: Refused · X Melek Ergen

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.