Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasRedbridgeCranbrook. ward2674/08
Planning application · Redbridge

2674/08.

8, Exeter Gardens, Ilford, IG1 3LA

Full / Other Planning at 8, Exeter Gardens, Ilford, IG1 3LA, received 6 Oct 2008 — refused on 19 Nov 2008 (delegated, X Melek Ergen).

RedbridgeCranbrook.IG1 3LA2674/08
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRedbridge profile →
Refused
Outcome
19 Nov 2008
6 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
3
Conditions
attached to the decision
3
Documents
3 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Redbridge planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Retention of metal railings and electronically operated gate to front boundary g

Reference
2674/08
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
IG1 3LA
Council
Received
6 Oct 2008
Target date
1 Dec 2008
Decision date
19 Nov 2008
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decided
Reference
2674/08
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
IG1 3LA
Council
Received
6 Oct 2008
Target date
1 Dec 2008
Decision date
19 Nov 2008
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Application form
24 Apr 2009
Decision notice
24 Apr 2009
PLANS & ELEVATIONS
24 Apr 2009
Application form
24 Apr 2009
Decision notice
24 Apr 2009
PLANS & ELEVATIONS
24 Apr 2009

Documents open on the Redbridge portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 19 Nov 2008, delegated decision by X Melek Ergen — 6 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
6 Oct 2008
Application received
1 Dec 2008
Statutory target date
19 Nov 2008
Delegated decision: Refused · X Melek Ergen
6 Oct 2008
Application received
1 Dec 2008
Statutory target date
19 Nov 2008
Delegated decision: Refused · X Melek Ergen

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.