Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasRedbridgeValentines ward2738/22
Planning application · Redbridge

2738/22.

Development At Ask Court Coventry Road And 126 To 148, Cranbrook Road, Ilford

Full / Other Planning at Development At Ask Court Coventry Road And 126 To 148, Cranbrook Road, Ilford, received 15 Aug 2022 — approved on 14 Nov 2022 (delegated, Thomas Smith-Keary).

RedbridgeValentines2738/22
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRedbridge profile →
Approved
Outcome
14 Nov 2022
13 wks
Decision time
5 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Redbridge planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Variation of condition 12 (Photovoltaics) of approved permission 4778/19, as varied by application 2550/22.

Reference
2738/22
Type
Section 73 - Major
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
15 Aug 2022
Validated
17 Aug 2022
Target date
14 Nov 2022
Decision date
14 Nov 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Despatched
Reference
2738/22
Type
Section 73 - Major
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
15 Aug 2022
Validated
17 Aug 2022
Target date
14 Nov 2022
Decision date
14 Nov 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Despatched
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Redbridge portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 14 Nov 2022, delegated decision by Thomas Smith-Keary — 13 weeks from submission (5 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
15 Aug 2022
Application received
17 Aug 2022
Application validated
14 Nov 2022
Statutory target date
14 Nov 2022
Delegated decision: Approved · Thomas Smith-Keary
15 Aug 2022
Application received
17 Aug 2022
Application validated
14 Nov 2022
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
14 Nov 2022
Delegated decision: Approved · Thomas Smith-Keary

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.