Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasRedbridgeGoodmayes ward2857/21/07
Planning application · Redbridge

2857/21/07.

Development At 1 To 16 Electric Parade, Seven Kings Road, Seven Kings, Ilford

Discharge of Conditions at Development At 1 To 16 Electric Parade, Seven Kings Road, Seven Kings, Ilford, received 9 Jan 2023 — refused on 23 May 2023 (delegated, X Ben Thompson).

RedbridgeGoodmayes2857/21/07
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRedbridge profile →
Refused
Outcome
23 May 2023
19 wks
Decision time
11 wks over the 8-week target
2
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Redbridge planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Discharge of conditions for approved permission 2857/21: External Lighting (Condition 10). (Summary).

Reference
2857/21/07
Type
Discharge of Condition(s)
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
9 Jan 2023
Validated
10 Jan 2023
Target date
6 Mar 2023
Decision date
23 May 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Despatched
Reference
2857/21/07
Type
Discharge of Condition(s)
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
9 Jan 2023
Validated
10 Jan 2023
Target date
6 Mar 2023
Decision date
23 May 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Despatched
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Redbridge portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 23 May 2023, delegated decision by X Ben Thompson — 19 weeks from submission (11 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
9 Jan 2023
Application received
10 Jan 2023
Application validated
6 Mar 2023
Statutory target date
23 May 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · X Ben Thompson
9 Jan 2023
Application received
10 Jan 2023
Application validated
6 Mar 2023
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
23 May 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · X Ben Thompson

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.