Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Redbridge›…Mayfield. wardIG3 9EF91, Dawlish Drive, Seven Kings›2951/02
Planning application · Redbridge

2951/02.

91, Dawlish Drive, Seven Kings

Full / Other Planning at 91, Dawlish Drive, Seven Kings, received 9 Dec 2002 — approved on 9 Jul 2003 (delegated, J. Upton).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRedbridge profile →
Approved
Outcome
9 Jul 2003
30 wks
Decision time
22 wks over the 8-week target
10
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Redbridge planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Two storey side extension, single storey rear extension, front porch extension.

Reference
2951/02
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
9 Dec 2002
Validated
13 Dec 2002
Target date
7 Feb 2003
Decision date
9 Jul 2003
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Made
Premises record
Council register
Reference
2951/02
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 17 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
9 Dec 2002
Validated
13 Dec 2002
Target date
7 Feb 2003
Decision date
9 Jul 2003
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Made
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Redbridge portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 9 Jul 2003, delegated decision by J. Upton — 30 weeks from submission (22 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
9 Dec 2002
Application received
13 Dec 2002
Application validated
7 Feb 2003
Statutory target date
9 Jul 2003
Delegated decision: Approved · J. Upton
9 Dec 2002
Application received
13 Dec 2002
Application validated
7 Feb 2003
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
9 Jul 2003
Delegated decision: Approved · J. Upton

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.