Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasRedbridgeLoxford ward3013/24
Planning application · Redbridge

3013/24.

DEVELOPMENT AT 3, CECIL ROAD, ILFORD

Full / Other Planning at DEVELOPMENT AT 3, CECIL ROAD, ILFORD, received 28 Oct 2024 — approved on 24 Jun 2025 by committee.

RedbridgeLoxford3013/24
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRedbridge profile →
Approved
Outcome
24 Jun 2025
34 wks
Decision time
26 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Redbridge planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

First floor rear extension. Subdivision of house into two dwellings (one x 3-bedroom and one x 2-bedroom) with associated amenity space, cycle and refuse storage. (AMENDED DESCRIPTION) (summary)

Reference
3013/24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
28 Oct 2024
Validated
10 Dec 2024
Target date
29 Jan 2025
Decision date
24 Jun 2025
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Development Completed
Reference
3013/24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
28 Oct 2024
Validated
10 Dec 2024
Target date
29 Jan 2025
Decision date
24 Jun 2025
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Development Completed
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Redbridge portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 24 Jun 2025, determined by the planning committee — 34 weeks from submission (26 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
28 Oct 2024
Application received
10 Dec 2024
Application validated
29 Jan 2025
Statutory target date
24 Jun 2025
Committee decision: Approved
28 Oct 2024
Application received
10 Dec 2024
Application validated
29 Jan 2025
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
24 Jun 2025
Committee decision: Approved

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Determined at committee
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Show all 4 rows
Determined at committee
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.