Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasRedbridgeChadwell ward3503/24
Planning application · Redbridge

3503/24.

3, Hall Road, Chadwell Heath, Romford, RM6 4LH

Householder at 3, Hall Road, Chadwell Heath, Romford, RM6 4LH, received 23 Dec 2024 — refused on 3 Mar 2025 (delegated, Thomas Smith-Keary).

RedbridgeChadwellRM6 4LH3503/24
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRedbridge profile →
Refused
Outcome
3 Mar 2025
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
2
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Redbridge planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single storey rear extension with a depth of 6.00 metres, highest point of 3.20 metres and height at the eaves of 3.00 metres.

Reference
3503/24
Type
Prior Approval - Householders
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM6 4LH
Council
Received
23 Dec 2024
Validated
24 Dec 2024
Target date
2 Feb 2025
Decision date
3 Mar 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Despatched
Reference
3503/24
Type
Prior Approval - Householders
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM6 4LH
Council
Received
23 Dec 2024
Validated
24 Dec 2024
Target date
2 Feb 2025
Decision date
3 Mar 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Despatched
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Redbridge portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 3 Mar 2025, delegated decision by Thomas Smith-Keary — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
23 Dec 2024
Application received
24 Dec 2024
Application validated
2 Feb 2025
Statutory target date
3 Mar 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Thomas Smith-Keary
23 Dec 2024
Application received
24 Dec 2024
Application validated
2 Feb 2025
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
3 Mar 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Thomas Smith-Keary

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.