Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasRedbridgeWanstead Park ward4481/21/03
Planning application · Redbridge

4481/21/03.

Development At Land West Of And Adjoining 1, Elm Close, Wanstead, London

Discharge of Conditions at Development At Land West Of And Adjoining 1, Elm Close, Wanstead, London, received 30 Nov 2022 — approved on 25 Jan 2023 (delegated, Thomas Smith-Keary).

RedbridgeWanstead Park4481/21/03
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRedbridge profile →
Approved
Outcome
25 Jan 2023
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
2
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Redbridge planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Discharge of conditions of approved permission 4481/21: Air Quality Assessment (condition 13). (summary)

Reference
4481/21/03
Type
Discharge of Condition(s)
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
30 Nov 2022
Validated
1 Dec 2022
Target date
25 Jan 2023
Decision date
25 Jan 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Despatched
Reference
4481/21/03
Type
Discharge of Condition(s)
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
30 Nov 2022
Validated
1 Dec 2022
Target date
25 Jan 2023
Decision date
25 Jan 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Despatched
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Redbridge portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 25 Jan 2023, delegated decision by Thomas Smith-Keary — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
30 Nov 2022
Application received
1 Dec 2022
Application validated
25 Jan 2023
Statutory target date
25 Jan 2023
Delegated decision: Approved · Thomas Smith-Keary
30 Nov 2022
Application received
1 Dec 2022
Application validated
25 Jan 2023
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
25 Jan 2023
Delegated decision: Approved · Thomas Smith-Keary

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.