Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Redbridge›…Clayhall wardIG4 5PH28, Leigh Avenue, Ilford, IG4 5PH›4787/19
Planning application · Redbridge

4787/19.

28, Leigh Avenue, Ilford, IG4 5PH

Householder at 28, Leigh Avenue, Ilford, IG4 5PH, received 20 Dec 2019 — not required on 30 Jan 2020 (delegated, Subash Jain).

Redbridge›Clayhall›IG4 5PH›4787/19
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRedbridge profile →
Not required
Outcome
30 Jan 2020
6 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
0
Conditions
attached to the decision
2
Documents
2 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Redbridge planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single storey rear extension with a depth of 6.0 metres, highest point of 3.0 me

Reference
4787/19
Type
Prior Approval - Householders
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
20 Dec 2019
Validated
2 Jan 2020
Target date
31 Jan 2020
Decision date
30 Jan 2020
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decided
Premises record
Council register
Reference
4787/19
Type
Prior Approval - Householders
Site
Show all 17 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
20 Dec 2019
Validated
2 Jan 2020
Target date
31 Jan 2020
Decision date
30 Jan 2020
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decided
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Application form
20 Dec 2019
Block Plans and Elevations
20 Dec 2019
Application form
20 Dec 2019
Block Plans and Elevations
20 Dec 2019

Documents open on the Redbridge portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Not required on 30 Jan 2020, delegated decision by Subash Jain — 6 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
20 Dec 2019
Application received
2 Jan 2020
Application validated
31 Jan 2020
Statutory target date
30 Jan 2020
Delegated decision: Not required · Subash Jain
20 Dec 2019
Application received
2 Jan 2020
Application validated
31 Jan 2020
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
30 Jan 2020
Delegated decision: Not required · Subash Jain

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.