Planning Atlas
AtlasHammersmith_and_fulham
London Planning Authority · Inner London

Hammersmith And Fulham.

Hammersmith And Fulham is a London borough with an approval rate of 88% across 58,823 substantive planning decisions spanning 28 wards. Most decisions here are made under delegation rather than at committee.[1]

Inner London28 wards217 appeals99% delegated
Wards shaded by approval rate · click one to open it
Showing
All years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glance · tap a metric to drill into this boroughAll investigations →
What wins here — Hammersmith And Fulham's policy playbook[3]

What Hammersmith And Fulham actually approves — its whole decision record, by application type — and the grounds its committee refuses on. Click through for the refusal grounds and the policies cited in the minutes.

Full / major
Lawful
Conditions
Listed
Data from publicly available Hammersmith And Fulham planning records and committee minutes 1996-01 – Wed 30 .
Case officers
Officer
Active
Applications
Approval rate
Mostly decides
to Wed 30
2,966
87%
Full / major planning
to Fri 08
1,779
86%
Full / major planning
to Mon 13
1,437
87%
Full / major planning
to 2010-05
1,404
91%
Full / major planning
to 2011-01
1,099
83%
Full / major planning
to 2011-01
1,029
92%
Full / major planning
to 2011-01
787
90%
Full / major planning
to 2011-09
782
86%
Full / major planning
to 2007-02
703
82%
Full / major planning
to Wed 26
667
93%
Full / major planning
to 2008-03
651
80%
Full / major planning
to Wed 09
646
91%
Full / major planning
to Wed 30
2,966
87%
Full / major planning
to Fri 08
1,779
86%
Full / major planning
to Mon 13
1,437
87%
Full / major planning
Show all 12 rows
to 2010-05
1,404
91%
Full / major planning
to 2011-01
1,099
83%
Full / major planning
to 2011-01
1,029
92%
Full / major planning
to 2011-01
787
90%
Full / major planning
to 2011-09
782
86%
Full / major planning
to 2007-02
703
82%
Full / major planning
to Wed 26
667
93%
Full / major planning
to 2008-03
651
80%
Full / major planning
to Wed 09
646
91%
Full / major planning

Approval rates per officer, 1996–Wed . Based on decided applications only. All Hammersmith And Fulham officers →

Planning committee members
Councillor
Ward
Party
Active
Cttee votes
Leaning
Munster
Conservative
Active
561
subscribers
College Park & Old Oak
Labour
Active
172
subscribers
Grove
Labour
Active
51
subscribers
West Kensington
Labour
Active
46
subscribers
Parsons Green & Sandford
Conservative
Active
43
subscribers
Coningham
Labour
Active
32
subscribers
Coningham
Labour
Active
31
subscribers
Wendell Park
Labour
Active
29
subscribers
Munster
Conservative
Active
561
subscribers
College Park & Old Oak
Labour
Active
172
subscribers
Grove
Labour
Active
51
subscribers
Show all 8 rows
West Kensington
Labour
Active
46
subscribers
Parsons Green & Sandford
Conservative
Active
43
subscribers
Coningham
Labour
Active
32
subscribers
Coningham
Labour
Active
31
subscribers
Wendell Park
Labour
Active
29
subscribers

Councillors on Hammersmith And Fulham's planning committee, by their recorded committee votes. “Leaning” = whether they tend to vote to approve or refuse. Full voting records →

Wards — ranked
Ward
Applications
Approval rate
Refusal rate
13
100%
0.0%
352
97%
2.6%
287
97%
2.6%
203
95%
4.7%
239
95%
5.1%
168
95%
5.2%
338
94%
5.8%
305
94%
6.0%
3,429
90%
9.9%
3,465
89%
10.5%
163
89%
11.3%
3,550
88%
11.9%
1,704
88%
12.5%
4,547
87%
12.6%
4,756
87%
12.6%
2,708
87%
12.6%
233
87%
12.8%
3,286
86%
13.8%
2,651
86%
14.1%
4,176
85%
15.5%
3,192
84%
16.3%
1,633
81%
18.8%
13
100%
0.0%
352
97%
2.6%
287
97%
2.6%
Show all 28 rows
203
95%
4.7%
239
95%
5.1%
168
95%
5.2%
338
94%
5.8%
305
94%
6.0%
3,429
90%
9.9%
3,465
89%
10.5%
163
89%
11.3%
3,550
88%
11.9%
1,704
88%
12.5%
4,547
87%
12.6%
4,756
87%
12.6%
2,708
87%
12.6%
233
87%
12.8%
3,286
86%
13.8%
2,651
86%
14.1%
4,176
85%
15.5%
3,192
84%
16.3%
1,633
81%
18.8%

Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the ward profile.

Consultant performance
Consultant
Applications
Approval rate
1. Icon Architects
456
92%
2. Ashley Fox Associates / Ashley Fox Associates
437
91%
3. Planning Solutions Ltd
401
76%
4. Ashley Fox Associates
287
89%
5. BAILY GARNER / BAILY GARNER
208
99%
6. Hogarth Architects
185
80%
7. MoreSpace
171
90%
8. CEDC
164
92%
1. Icon Architects
456
92%
2. Ashley Fox Associates / Ashley Fox Associates
437
91%
3. Planning Solutions Ltd
401
76%
Show all 8 rows
4. Ashley Fox Associates
287
89%
5. BAILY GARNER / BAILY GARNER
208
99%
6. Hogarth Architects
185
80%
7. MoreSpace
171
90%
8. CEDC
164
92%

Rankings based on applications submitted and decided. Performance from public planning records.

At a glance[2]
BoroughHammersmith And Fulham
London approval avg79%
London overturn avg26%
Total appeals217
Appeals allowed94 (43.3%)
Conditions / approval6.31
Local plan

The adopted Hammersmith And Fulham Local Plan (targets, CIL, plan period) is a separate source still being loaded. What the record already shows: which applications win here, and the grounds refusals cite.

What wins →

Sources & method
  1. [1]Approval rates, decision times, delegation and ward breakdowns — London Borough of Hammersmith And Fulham planning register and published decision notices, 1996–Wed . · methodology
  2. [2]London benchmarks, appeal overturn rates, appeals allowed and costs awarded — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) published appeal decisions. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]“What wins here” — Hammersmith And Fulham’s substantive decision record grouped by application type; committee refusal grounds and cited policies coded from published committee minutes.
  4. [4]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Hammersmith And Fulham grant/split decision notices, parsed from the published notice text (221 high-confidence notices).
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.