Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Hammersmith And Fulham›…Munster wardSW6 5EB9 Burnfoot Avenue London SW6 5EB›2000/02909/CLP
Planning application · Hammersmith And Fulham

2000/02909/CLP.

9 Burnfoot Avenue London SW6 5EB

Lawful Development Certificate at 9 Burnfoot Avenue London SW6 5EB, received 22 Nov 2000 — approved on 26 Jan 2001 (delegated, Jennifer Valentine).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHammersmith And Fulham profile →
Approved
Outcome
26 Jan 2001
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
2
Documents
2 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hammersmith And Fulham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of a single storey rear extension to side and rear of existing back addition.

Reference
2000/02909/CLP
Type
Certificate of Lawfulness Proposed
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
22 Nov 2000
Target date
25 Jan 2004
Decision date
26 Jan 2001
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Reference
2000/02909/CLP
Type
Certificate of Lawfulness Proposed
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
22 Nov 2000
Target date
25 Jan 2004
Decision date
26 Jan 2001
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Report
—
Decision
—
Report
—
Decision
—

Documents open on the Hammersmith And Fulham portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 26 Jan 2001, delegated decision by Jennifer Valentine — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
22 Nov 2000
Application received
25 Jan 2004
Statutory target date
26 Jan 2001
Delegated decision: Approved · Jennifer Valentine
22 Nov 2000
Application received
25 Jan 2004
Statutory target date
26 Jan 2001
Delegated decision: Approved · Jennifer Valentine

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.