Planning application · Hammersmith And Fulham
2007/03318/FUL.
Full / Other Planning at 53 Bridgeview London W6 9DD, received 13 Sep 2007 — approved on 5 Nov 2007 (delegated, Erin Murphy).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHammersmith And Fulham profile →
Approved
Outcome
5 Nov 2007
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
11
Documents
11 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hammersmith And Fulham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Installation of rooflights in the side and rear roofslope.
Reference
2007/03318/FUL
Type
Full Planning Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
13 Sep 2007
Validated
14 Sep 2007
Target date
5 Nov 2010
Decision date
5 Nov 2007
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Final Decision
Council register
Reference
2007/03318/FUL
Type
Full Planning Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
13 Sep 2007
Validated
14 Sep 2007
Target date
5 Nov 2010
Decision date
5 Nov 2007
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Final Decision
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Hammersmith And Fulham portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Approved on 5 Nov 2007, delegated decision by Erin Murphy — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
13 Sep 2007
Application received
14 Sep 2007
Application validated
5 Nov 2010
Statutory target date
5 Nov 2007
Delegated decision: Approved · Erin Murphy
13 Sep 2007
Application received
14 Sep 2007
Application validated
5 Nov 2010
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
5 Nov 2007
Delegated decision: Approved · Erin Murphy
Public response
Comment counts were not captured for this application.
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.